51,002 companies ranked3,437,403 Google reviews analyzedPulled from the top 100 US cities (adding more)0 paid placementsData updated Oct 31, 2026How we rank

Universal Lawn Care & Property Management LLC

945Ranked #945 of 1,557 in the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA area ▲ 36 since Oct 31, 2026

5.0(9)Score 67.2 / 1001357th most reviewedServes the Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA area
What we checked

No company can pay for its position. Sponsor blocks are labeled. How we rank

Why it ranks #945

Review quality58.1 / 65
Review volume9.1 / 35

Weighted rating 4.84 (its 5.0 Google rating, pulled toward the area average until it has many reviews). Volume is 9 reviews on a log scale against the most reviewed company in the area (6,785). The full method

Where it ranks in Marietta: every ranked company's score
050100
Rank history (2 updates)

At a glance

Serves
The Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA area (no public street address)
Phone
(404) 429-6166
Website
universallawncare.com
Weekdays
9 AM to 5 PM
Saturday
Open

Services

Lawn care

From the categories Universal Lawn Care & Property Management LLC lists on Google: Lawn care service, Service establishment.

Review signals

We have not read review dates for Universal Lawn Care & Property Management LLC yet. Its Google rating and review count are above.

We show dates and counts we computed, never the review text. Read the reviews on Google

Compare to the top 3 in Marietta

CompanyRankScoreRating
Stump Grinder Company#389.05.0 (477)
Weed Pro Lawn Care#788.04.9 (976)
Rivermoore Lawn Care#987.85.0 (350)
Universal Lawn Care & Property Management LLC#94567.25.0 (9)
The full Marietta ranking

Closest landscapers

Want Universal Lawn Care & Property Management LLC to quote your yard?

Design it first, then get quotes.

Upload a photo of your yard, pick a style, and get AI-generated design ideas in seconds. Free, no credit card required. Then every quote is for the same plan.

Ratings and review counts: Google Maps, read Oct 31, 2026. Data updated Nov 3, 2026. Something wrong? Correct this listing. Corrections