51,002 companies ranked3,437,403 Google reviews analyzedPulled from the top 100 US cities (adding more)0 paid placementsData updated Oct 31, 2026How we rank

TurfTec Landscape & Design

169Ranked #169 of 180 in the Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC area ▲ 11 since Oct 31, 2026

4.1(16)Score 50.4 / 100122nd most reviewedServes the Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC area
What we checked

No company can pay for its position. Sponsor blocks are labeled. How we rank

Why it ranks #169

Review quality37.3 / 65
Review volume13.1 / 35

Weighted rating 4.36 (its 4.1 Google rating, pulled toward the area average until it has many reviews). Volume is 16 reviews on a log scale against the most reviewed company in the area (1,898). The full method

Where it ranks in Augusta: every ranked company's score
050100
Rank history (2 updates)

At a glance

Serves
The Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC area (no public street address)
Phone
(803) 292-9597
Website
turfteclandscapeanddesign.com
Weekdays
9 AM to 4 PM
Saturday
Closed

Services

Landscape designIrrigation and sprinklers

From the categories TurfTec Landscape & Design lists on Google: Landscaper, Service establishment, Landscape designer, Lawn sprinkler system contractor.

Review signals

We have not read review dates for TurfTec Landscape & Design yet. Its Google rating and review count are above.

We show dates and counts we computed, never the review text. Read the reviews on Google

Compare to the top 3 in Augusta

CompanyRankScoreRating
Lawn Ace#195.74.9 (1,898)
SandHills Land & Septic Services, LLC#388.55.0 (175)
Eben Gray's Tree Service, LLC#488.34.9 (386)
TurfTec Landscape & Design#16950.44.1 (16)
The full Augusta ranking

Closest landscapers

Want TurfTec Landscape & Design to quote your yard?

Design it first, then get quotes.

Upload a photo of your yard, pick a style, and get AI-generated design ideas in seconds. Free, no credit card required. Then every quote is for the same plan.

Ratings and review counts: Google Maps, read Oct 31, 2026. Data updated Nov 3, 2026. Something wrong? Correct this listing. Corrections