51,002 companies ranked3,437,403 Google reviews analyzedPulled from the top 100 US cities (adding more)0 paid placementsData updated Oct 31, 2026How we rank

Tree Daddy Tree Experts LLC.

266Ranked #266 of 1,192 in the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI area ▲ 9 since Oct 31, 2026

4.9(42)Score 74.1 / 100394th most reviewedServes the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI area
What we checked

No company can pay for its position. Sponsor blocks are labeled. How we rank

Why it ranks #266

Review quality58.5 / 65
Review volume15.6 / 35

Weighted rating 4.85 (its 4.9 Google rating, pulled toward the area average until it has many reviews). Volume is 42 reviews on a log scale against the most reviewed company in the area (4,632). The full method

Where it ranks in Waterford Township: every ranked company's score
050100
Rank history (2 updates)

At a glance

Serves
The Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI area (no public street address)
Phone
(248) 369-1055
Website
treedaddytreeexperts.com
Weekdays
Open 24 hours
Saturday
Open

Services

Tree service

From the categories Tree Daddy Tree Experts LLC. lists on Google: Tree service, Arborist service, Crane service, Service establishment.

Review signals

We have not read review dates for Tree Daddy Tree Experts LLC. yet. Its Google rating and review count are above.

We show dates and counts we computed, never the review text. Read the reviews on Google

Compare to the top 3 in Waterford Township

CompanyRankScoreRating
Conserva Irrigation of Ann Arbor#190.55.0 (525)
Danny's Professional Landscaping#389.25.0 (378)
VanGordon Tree & Land Solutions#588.55.0 (323)
Tree Daddy Tree Experts LLC.#26674.14.9 (42)
The full Waterford Township ranking

Closest landscapers

Want Tree Daddy Tree Experts LLC. to quote your yard?

Design it first, then get quotes.

Upload a photo of your yard, pick a style, and get AI-generated design ideas in seconds. Free, no credit card required. Then every quote is for the same plan.

Ratings and review counts: Google Maps, read Oct 31, 2026. Data updated Nov 3, 2026. Something wrong? Correct this listing. Corrections