51,002 companies ranked3,437,403 Google reviews analyzedPulled from the top 100 US cities (adding more)0 paid placementsData updated Oct 31, 2026How we rank

Thomas Stone & Materials

452Ranked #452 of 478 in the San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX area ▲ 29 since Oct 31, 2026

4.0(61)Score 45.9 / 100125th most reviewedSan Antonio, TX
What we checked

No company can pay for its position. Sponsor blocks are labeled. How we rank

Why it ranks #452

Review quality26.0 / 65
Review volume19.9 / 35

Weighted rating 4.10 (its 4.0 Google rating, pulled toward the area average until it has many reviews). Volume is 61 reviews on a log scale against the most reviewed company in the area (1,416). The full method

Where it ranks in San Antonio: every ranked company's score
050100
Rank history (2 updates)

At a glance

Address
18816 FM 2252, San Antonio, TX 78266
Phone
(210) 495-8873
Website
thomas-stone.com
Weekdays
7:30 AM to 4:30 PM
Saturday
Open

Services

Hardscaping and patios

From the categories Thomas Stone & Materials lists on Google: Landscaper, Aggregate supplier, Granite supplier, Landscaping supply store, Mulch supplier, Sand & gravel supplier, Sod supplier, Stone supplier, Topsoil supplier.

Review signals

We have not read review dates for Thomas Stone & Materials yet. Its Google rating and review count are above.

We show dates and counts we computed, never the review text. Read the reviews on Google

Compare to the top 3 in San Antonio

CompanyRankScoreRating
S.A. Total Tree Service#198.65.0 (1,058)
All American Irrigation Systems LLC#291.34.8 (1,416)
Olshan Foundation Repair#490.54.8 (1,190)
Thomas Stone & Materials#45245.94.0 (61)
The full San Antonio ranking

Closest landscapers

Want Thomas Stone & Materials to quote your yard?

Design it first, then get quotes.

Upload a photo of your yard, pick a style, and get AI-generated design ideas in seconds. Free, no credit card required. Then every quote is for the same plan.

Ratings and review counts: Google Maps, read Oct 31, 2026. Data updated Nov 3, 2026. Something wrong? Correct this listing. Corrections