51,002 companies ranked3,437,403 Google reviews analyzedPulled from the top 100 US cities (adding more)0 paid placementsData updated Oct 31, 2026How we rank

Percy's Lawn Care and Son

50Ranked #50 of 324 in the Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY area ▲ 5 since Oct 31, 2026

4.9(61)Score 77.8 / 10065th most reviewedServes the Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY area
What we checked

No company can pay for its position. Sponsor blocks are labeled. How we rank

Why it ranks #50

Review quality59.4 / 65
Review volume18.4 / 35

Weighted rating 4.87 (its 4.9 Google rating, pulled toward the area average until it has many reviews). Volume is 61 reviews on a log scale against the most reviewed company in the area (2,533). The full method

Where it ranks in Buffalo: every ranked company's score
050100
Rank history (2 updates)

At a glance

Serves
The Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY area (no public street address)
Phone
(716) 245-5296
Website
percyslawncare.com
Weekdays
7 AM to 6 PM
Saturday
Open

Services

Lawn careLandscape designSnow removal

From the categories Percy's Lawn Care and Son lists on Google: Lawn care service, Debris removal service, Service establishment, Gardener, Landscape designer, Landscaper, Snow removal service.

Review signals

We have not read review dates for Percy's Lawn Care and Son yet. Its Google rating and review count are above.

We show dates and counts we computed, never the review text. Read the reviews on Google

Compare to the top 3 in Buffalo

CompanyRankScoreRating
Seasonal Lawncare#195.74.9 (2,533)
Pierce & Co. Tree Services#390.05.0 (294)
Lavocat's Family Greenhouse and Nursery#488.64.9 (520)
Percy's Lawn Care and Son#5077.84.9 (61)
The full Buffalo ranking

Closest landscapers

Want Percy's Lawn Care and Son to quote your yard?

Design it first, then get quotes.

Upload a photo of your yard, pick a style, and get AI-generated design ideas in seconds. Free, no credit card required. Then every quote is for the same plan.

Ratings and review counts: Google Maps, read Oct 31, 2026. Data updated Nov 3, 2026. Something wrong? Correct this listing. Corrections