51,002 companies ranked3,437,403 Google reviews analyzedPulled from the top 100 US cities (adding more)0 paid placementsData updated Oct 31, 2026How we rank

Mckinnley Excavating

156Ranked #156 of 166 in the Chattanooga, TN-GA area ▲ 13 since Oct 31, 2026

4.2(46)Score 55.3 / 10063rd most reviewedChattanooga, TN
What we checked

No company can pay for its position. Sponsor blocks are labeled. How we rank

Why it ranks #156

Review quality35.1 / 65
Review volume20.2 / 35

Weighted rating 4.31 (its 4.2 Google rating, pulled toward the area average until it has many reviews). Volume is 46 reviews on a log scale against the most reviewed company in the area (788). The full method

Where it ranks in Chattanooga: every ranked company's score
050100
Rank history (2 updates)

At a glance

Address
411 W 21st St, Chattanooga, TN 37408
Phone
(423) 314-5041
Website
digchattanooga.com
Weekdays
7 AM to 6 PM
Saturday
Closed

Services

Hardscaping and patiosTree service

From the categories Mckinnley Excavating lists on Google: Landscaper, Demolition contractor, Dirt supplier, Excavating contractor, Landscaping supply store, Paving materials supplier, Retaining wall supplier, Tree service, Water damage restoration service.

Review signals

We have not read review dates for Mckinnley Excavating yet. Its Google rating and review count are above.

We show dates and counts we computed, never the review text. Read the reviews on Google

Compare to the top 3 in Chattanooga

CompanyRankScoreRating
Chattanooga Tree Service Inc.#197.85.0 (522)
TurfScapes of Tennessee#296.25.0 (380)
Elias Chavez Tree Service#396.25.0 (378)
Mckinnley Excavating#15655.34.2 (46)
The full Chattanooga ranking

Closest landscapers

Want Mckinnley Excavating to quote your yard?

Design it first, then get quotes.

Upload a photo of your yard, pick a style, and get AI-generated design ideas in seconds. Free, no credit card required. Then every quote is for the same plan.

Ratings and review counts: Google Maps, read Oct 31, 2026. Data updated Nov 3, 2026. Something wrong? Correct this listing. Corrections