51,002 companies ranked3,437,403 Google reviews analyzedPulled from the top 100 US cities (adding more)0 paid placementsData updated Oct 31, 2026How we rank

M & E Excavation and Tree Service, LLC

132Ranked #132 of 166 in the Chattanooga, TN-GA area ▲ 8 since Oct 31, 2026

5.0(5)Score 68.8 / 100164th most reviewedServes the Chattanooga, TN-GA area
What we checked

No company can pay for its position. Sponsor blocks are labeled. How we rank

Why it ranks #132

Review quality59.4 / 65
Review volume9.4 / 35

Weighted rating 4.87 (its 5.0 Google rating, pulled toward the area average until it has many reviews). Volume is 5 reviews on a log scale against the most reviewed company in the area (788). The full method

Where it ranks in Chattanooga: every ranked company's score
050100
Rank history (2 updates)

At a glance

Serves
The Chattanooga, TN-GA area (no public street address)
Phone
(423) 838-6012
Website
me-excavation.com
Weekdays
7 AM to 5 PM
Saturday
Closed

Services

Tree service

From the categories M & E Excavation and Tree Service, LLC lists on Google: Excavating contractor, Demolition contractor, Service establishment, Pond contractor, Tree service.

Review signals

We have not read review dates for M & E Excavation and Tree Service, LLC yet. Its Google rating and review count are above.

We show dates and counts we computed, never the review text. Read the reviews on Google

Compare to the top 3 in Chattanooga

CompanyRankScoreRating
Chattanooga Tree Service Inc.#197.85.0 (522)
TurfScapes of Tennessee#296.25.0 (380)
Elias Chavez Tree Service#396.25.0 (378)
M & E Excavation and Tree Service, LLC#13268.85.0 (5)
The full Chattanooga ranking

Closest landscapers

Want M & E Excavation and Tree Service, LLC to quote your yard?

Design it first, then get quotes.

Upload a photo of your yard, pick a style, and get AI-generated design ideas in seconds. Free, no credit card required. Then every quote is for the same plan.

Ratings and review counts: Google Maps, read Oct 31, 2026. Data updated Nov 3, 2026. Something wrong? Correct this listing. Corrections