51,002 companies ranked3,437,403 Google reviews analyzedPulled from the top 100 US cities (adding more)0 paid placementsData updated Oct 31, 2026How we rank

LW Landscaping

212Ranked #212 of 1,608 in the Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX area ▲ 18 since Oct 31, 2026

4.9(115)Score 81.5 / 100243rd most reviewedMidlothian, TX
What we checked

No company can pay for its position. Sponsor blocks are labeled. How we rank

Why it ranks #212

Review quality60.2 / 65
Review volume21.3 / 35

Weighted rating 4.89 (its 4.9 Google rating, pulled toward the area average until it has many reviews). Volume is 115 reviews on a log scale against the most reviewed company in the area (2,485). The full method

Where it ranks in Midlothian: every ranked company's score
050100
Rank history (2 updates)

At a glance

Address
1061 Enterprise Dr Unit A, Midlothian, TX 76065
Phone
(469) 529-7696
Website
lwlandscaping.com
Weekdays
Open 24 hours
Saturday
Open

Services

Tree serviceLandscape designLandscape lightingIrrigation and sprinklers

From the categories LW Landscaping lists on Google: Landscaper, Arborist service, Landscape designer, Landscape lighting designer, Lawn sprinkler system contractor, Lighting contractor, Mulch supplier, Sod supplier, Tree farm, Tree service.

Review signals

We have not read review dates for LW Landscaping yet. Its Google rating and review count are above.

We show dates and counts we computed, never the review text. Read the reviews on Google

The top of Midlothian

CompanyRankScoreRating
LW Landscaping#21281.54.9 (115)
Vista Lawn and Pest#30379.54.7 (461)
Greenridge Landscaping#43477.55.0 (28)
Beaty Lawn & Landscape#61075.04.8 (64)
The full Midlothian ranking

Closest landscapers

Want LW Landscaping to quote your yard?

Design it first, then get quotes.

Upload a photo of your yard, pick a style, and get AI-generated design ideas in seconds. Free, no credit card required. Then every quote is for the same plan.

Ratings and review counts: Google Maps, read Oct 31, 2026. Data updated Nov 3, 2026. Something wrong? Correct this listing. Corrections