51,002 companies ranked3,437,403 Google reviews analyzedPulled from the top 100 US cities (adding more)0 paid placementsData updated Oct 31, 2026How we rank

Liberty Tree Service and Lawn Care

246Ranked #246 of 272 in the Las Vegas-Henderson-North Las Vegas, NV area ▲ 12 since Oct 31, 2026

3.5(12)Score 35.5 / 100207th most reviewedServes the Las Vegas-Henderson-North Las Vegas, NV area
What we checked

No company can pay for its position. Sponsor blocks are labeled. How we rank

Why it ranks #246

Review quality23.0 / 65
Review volume12.5 / 35

Weighted rating 4.03 (its 3.5 Google rating, pulled toward the area average until it has many reviews). Volume is 12 reviews on a log scale against the most reviewed company in the area (1,278). The full method

Where it ranks in Las Vegas: every ranked company's score
050100
Rank history (2 updates)

At a glance

Serves
The Las Vegas-Henderson-North Las Vegas, NV area (no public street address)
Phone
(702) 220-8932
Website
libertytreeandlawn.net
Weekdays
8:30 AM to 3 PM
Saturday
Open

Services

Tree service

From the categories Liberty Tree Service and Lawn Care lists on Google: Tree service, Service establishment.

Review signals

We have not read review dates for Liberty Tree Service and Lawn Care yet. Its Google rating and review count are above.

We show dates and counts we computed, never the review text. Read the reviews on Google

Compare to the top 3 in Las Vegas

CompanyRankScoreRating
Peak Services#391.04.9 (496)
RedGator Tree Trimmin’ and Landscape LLC#590.15.0 (202)
Ugarte Landscapes & Irrigation Repair#690.04.9 (436)
Liberty Tree Service and Lawn Care#24635.53.5 (12)
The full Las Vegas ranking

Closest landscapers

Want Liberty Tree Service and Lawn Care to quote your yard?

Design it first, then get quotes.

Upload a photo of your yard, pick a style, and get AI-generated design ideas in seconds. Free, no credit card required. Then every quote is for the same plan.

Ratings and review counts: Google Maps, read Oct 31, 2026. Data updated Nov 3, 2026. Something wrong? Correct this listing. Corrections