51,002 companies ranked3,437,403 Google reviews analyzedPulled from the top 100 US cities (adding more)0 paid placementsData updated Oct 31, 2026How we rank

JCJ Landscaping and Snow Removal

270Ranked #270 of 1,331 in the Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI area ▲ 13 since Oct 31, 2026

4.9(54)Score 75.6 / 100323rd most reviewedShakopee, MN
What we checked

No company can pay for its position. Sponsor blocks are labeled. How we rank

Why it ranks #270

Review quality59.4 / 65
Review volume16.2 / 35

Weighted rating 4.87 (its 4.9 Google rating, pulled toward the area average until it has many reviews). Volume is 54 reviews on a log scale against the most reviewed company in the area (5,750). The full method

Where it ranks in Shakopee: every ranked company's score
050100
Rank history (2 updates)

At a glance

Address
14415 Old Brick Yard Rd, Shakopee, MN 55379
Phone
(952) 649-6655
Website
jcjpropertymaintenance.com
Weekdays
Open 24 hours
Saturday
Open

Services

Landscape designLawn careSnow removalTree service

From the categories JCJ Landscaping and Snow Removal lists on Google: Landscaper, Landscape designer, Lawn care service, Property maintenance, Snow removal service, Tree service.

Review signals

We have not read review dates for JCJ Landscaping and Snow Removal yet. Its Google rating and review count are above.

We show dates and counts we computed, never the review text. Read the reviews on Google

Compare to the top 3 in Shakopee

CompanyRankScoreRating
Curb-It Design LLC.#4382.65.0 (107)
Your Tree Guy#14678.64.9 (104)
Doehling Landscape Services#21476.54.8 (163)
JCJ Landscaping and Snow Removal#27075.64.9 (54)
The full Shakopee ranking

Closest landscapers

Want JCJ Landscaping and Snow Removal to quote your yard?

Design it first, then get quotes.

Upload a photo of your yard, pick a style, and get AI-generated design ideas in seconds. Free, no credit card required. Then every quote is for the same plan.

Ratings and review counts: Google Maps, read Oct 31, 2026. Data updated Nov 3, 2026. Something wrong? Correct this listing. Corrections