51,002 companies ranked3,437,403 Google reviews analyzedPulled from the top 100 US cities (adding more)0 paid placementsData updated Oct 31, 2026How we rank

Harmon's Lawn Care & Grading

109Ranked #109 of 222 in the Greensboro-High Point, NC area ▲ 9 since Oct 31, 2026

5.0(14)Score 72.4 / 100153rd most reviewedServes the Greensboro-High Point, NC area
What we checked

No company can pay for its position. Sponsor blocks are labeled. How we rank

Why it ranks #109

Review quality60.2 / 65
Review volume12.2 / 35

Weighted rating 4.89 (its 5.0 Google rating, pulled toward the area average until it has many reviews). Volume is 14 reviews on a log scale against the most reviewed company in the area (2,406). The full method

Where it ranks in Greensboro: every ranked company's score
050100
Rank history (2 updates)

At a glance

Serves
The Greensboro-High Point, NC area (no public street address)
Phone
(336) 906-8074
Website
harmonslawncareandgrading.com
Weekdays
7 AM to 8 PM
Saturday
Open

Services

Lawn careLandscape designHardscaping and patios

From the categories Harmon's Lawn Care & Grading lists on Google: Lawn care service, Service establishment, Landscape designer, Landscaper, Retaining wall supplier.

Review signals

We have not read review dates for Harmon's Lawn Care & Grading yet. Its Google rating and review count are above.

We show dates and counts we computed, never the review text. Read the reviews on Google

Compare to the top 3 in Greensboro

CompanyRankScoreRating
The Green Team#190.15.0 (289)
Tender Lawn Care#289.54.9 (613)
The Davey Tree Expert Company#388.34.9 (467)
Harmon's Lawn Care & Grading#10972.45.0 (14)
The full Greensboro ranking

Closest landscapers

Want Harmon's Lawn Care & Grading to quote your yard?

Design it first, then get quotes.

Upload a photo of your yard, pick a style, and get AI-generated design ideas in seconds. Free, no credit card required. Then every quote is for the same plan.

Ratings and review counts: Google Maps, read Oct 31, 2026. Data updated Nov 3, 2026. Something wrong? Correct this listing. Corrections