51,002 companies ranked3,437,403 Google reviews analyzedPulled from the top 100 US cities (adding more)0 paid placementsData updated Oct 31, 2026How we rank

Green O' Aces Pools & Landscape

186Ranked #186 of 272 in the Las Vegas-Henderson-North Las Vegas, NV area ▲ 12 since Oct 31, 2026

4.5(23)Score 61.0 / 100152nd most reviewedLas Vegas, NV
What we checked

No company can pay for its position. Sponsor blocks are labeled. How we rank

Why it ranks #186

Review quality45.5 / 65
Review volume15.5 / 35

Weighted rating 4.55 (its 4.5 Google rating, pulled toward the area average until it has many reviews). Volume is 23 reviews on a log scale against the most reviewed company in the area (1,278). The full method

Where it ranks in Las Vegas: every ranked company's score
050100
Rank history (2 updates)

At a glance

Address
7975 W Badura Ave Ste 1010, Las Vegas, NV 89113
Phone
(702) 916-4777
Website
greenoaces.com
Saturday
Open

Services

Pools and pool landscapingLandscape designLandscape lighting

From the categories Green O' Aces Pools & Landscape lists on Google: Swimming pool contractor, Landscape architect, Landscape lighting designer, Swimming pool repair service.

Review signals

We have not read review dates for Green O' Aces Pools & Landscape yet. Its Google rating and review count are above.

We show dates and counts we computed, never the review text. Read the reviews on Google

Compare to the top 3 in Las Vegas

CompanyRankScoreRating
Peak Services#391.04.9 (496)
RedGator Tree Trimmin’ and Landscape LLC#590.15.0 (202)
Ugarte Landscapes & Irrigation Repair#690.04.9 (436)
Green O' Aces Pools & Landscape#18661.04.5 (23)
The full Las Vegas ranking

Closest landscapers

Want Green O' Aces Pools & Landscape to quote your yard?

Design it first, then get quotes.

Upload a photo of your yard, pick a style, and get AI-generated design ideas in seconds. Free, no credit card required. Then every quote is for the same plan.

Ratings and review counts: Google Maps, read Oct 31, 2026. Data updated Nov 3, 2026. Something wrong? Correct this listing. Corrections