51,002 companies ranked3,437,403 Google reviews analyzedPulled from the top 100 US cities (adding more)0 paid placementsData updated Oct 31, 2026How we rank

Down to Earth Landscaping

569Ranked #569 of 1,689 in the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN area ▲ 34 since Oct 31, 2026

4.7(98)Score 71.1 / 100207th most reviewedBarrington, IL
What we checked

No company can pay for its position. Sponsor blocks are labeled. How we rank

Why it ranks #569

Review quality52.0 / 65
Review volume19.1 / 35

Weighted rating 4.70 (its 4.7 Google rating, pulled toward the area average until it has many reviews). Volume is 98 reviews on a log scale against the most reviewed company in the area (4,615). The full method

Where it ranks in Chicago: every ranked company's score
050100
Rank history (2 updates)

At a glance

Address
15N365 Old Sutton Rd, Barrington, IL 60010
Phone
(847) 426-1150
Website
dtelandscape.org
Saturday
Open

Services

Lawn careLandscape designSnow removalTree service

From the categories Down to Earth Landscaping lists on Google: Lawn care service, Aggregate supplier, Firewood supplier, Landscape designer, Landscaper, Mulch supplier, Sand & gravel supplier, Snow removal service, Topsoil supplier, Tree service.

Review signals

We have not read review dates for Down to Earth Landscaping yet. Its Google rating and review count are above.

We show dates and counts we computed, never the review text. Read the reviews on Google

Compare to the top 3 in Chicago

CompanyRankScoreRating
Weiss Lawn Care#195.74.9 (4,615)
Aptive Pest Control#490.54.9 (1,325)
Mosquito Hunters of Chicago#589.64.9 (1,057)
Down to Earth Landscaping#56971.14.7 (98)
The full Chicago ranking

Closest landscapers

Want Down to Earth Landscaping to quote your yard?

Design it first, then get quotes.

Upload a photo of your yard, pick a style, and get AI-generated design ideas in seconds. Free, no credit card required. Then every quote is for the same plan.

Ratings and review counts: Google Maps, read Oct 31, 2026. Data updated Nov 3, 2026. Something wrong? Correct this listing. Corrections