51,002 companies ranked3,437,403 Google reviews analyzedPulled from the top 100 US cities (adding more)0 paid placementsData updated Oct 31, 2026How we rank

Birch Hill Landscape & Design, LLC

354Ranked #354 of 438 in the Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT area ▲ 22 since Oct 31, 2026

4.4(25)Score 60.0 / 100195th most reviewedNewington, CT
What we checked

No company can pay for its position. Sponsor blocks are labeled. How we rank

Why it ranks #354

Review quality43.3 / 65
Review volume16.7 / 35

Weighted rating 4.50 (its 4.4 Google rating, pulled toward the area average until it has many reviews). Volume is 25 reviews on a log scale against the most reviewed company in the area (931). The full method

Where it ranks in Newington: every ranked company's score
050100
Rank history (2 updates)

At a glance

Address
700 N Mountain Rd #3, Newington, CT 06111
Phone
(860) 953-0339
Website
birchhilllandscape.com
Weekdays
8 AM to 4 PM
Saturday
Closed

Services

Lawn careLandscape designLandscape lightingSnow removal

From the categories Birch Hill Landscape & Design, LLC lists on Google: Lawn care service, Landscape designer, Landscape lighting designer, Landscaper, Snow removal service.

Review signals

We have not read review dates for Birch Hill Landscape & Design, LLC yet. Its Google rating and review count are above.

We show dates and counts we computed, never the review text. Read the reviews on Google

Compare to the top 3 in Newington

CompanyRankScoreRating
Green Meadow Lawn Care#198.75.0 (723)
Arbortech Tree Inc.#297.65.0 (578)
Northeast Tree LLC#392.45.0 (229)
Birch Hill Landscape & Design, LLC#35460.04.4 (25)
The full Newington ranking

Closest landscapers

Want Birch Hill Landscape & Design, LLC to quote your yard?

Design it first, then get quotes.

Upload a photo of your yard, pick a style, and get AI-generated design ideas in seconds. Free, no credit card required. Then every quote is for the same plan.

Ratings and review counts: Google Maps, read Oct 31, 2026. Data updated Nov 3, 2026. Something wrong? Correct this listing. Corrections