51,002 companies ranked3,437,403 Google reviews analyzedPulled from the top 100 US cities (adding more)0 paid placementsData updated Oct 31, 2026How we rank

Advanced Pavers & Landscape

42Ranked #42 of 457 in the Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom, CA area ▲ 2 since Oct 31, 2026

5.0(62)Score 81.8 / 10083rd most reviewedSacramento, CA
What we checked

No company can pay for its position. Sponsor blocks are labeled. How we rank

Why it ranks #42

Review quality63.7 / 65
Review volume18.1 / 35

Weighted rating 4.97 (its 5.0 Google rating, pulled toward the area average until it has many reviews). Volume is 62 reviews on a log scale against the most reviewed company in the area (2,996). The full method

Where it ranks in Sacramento: every ranked company's score
050100
Rank history (2 updates)

At a glance

Address
4200 82nd St Ste I, Sacramento, CA 95826
Phone
(916) 536-7165
Website
advancedpaverslandscape.com
Weekdays
8 AM to 5 PM
Saturday
Open

Services

Landscape designHardscaping and patios

From the categories Advanced Pavers & Landscape lists on Google: Landscape designer, Concrete contractor, Landscape architect, Landscaper, Masonry contractor, Paving contractor.

Review signals

We have not read review dates for Advanced Pavers & Landscape yet. Its Google rating and review count are above.

We show dates and counts we computed, never the review text. Read the reviews on Google

Compare to the top 3 in Sacramento

CompanyRankScoreRating
EcoGuard Pest Management#195.74.9 (2,996)
Easystumps Tree Services Corp#293.15.0 (611)
The Lighting Geek | Outdoor Lighting & Illuminations#688.85.0 (257)
Advanced Pavers & Landscape#4281.85.0 (62)
The full Sacramento ranking

Closest landscapers

Want Advanced Pavers & Landscape to quote your yard?

Design it first, then get quotes.

Upload a photo of your yard, pick a style, and get AI-generated design ideas in seconds. Free, no credit card required. Then every quote is for the same plan.

Ratings and review counts: Google Maps, read Oct 31, 2026. Data updated Nov 3, 2026. Something wrong? Correct this listing. Corrections